Change and Expectations in Macroeconomic Models: Recognizing the Limits to Knowability | E-Axes
 

Search
Login
Username:
Password:
Not a member yet? Click here.
Forgot your Password?
Archives - Categories
Home
On Inequality
On the Eurozone Debt Crisis
On Monetary Policy and Central Banking
On Global Economic Growth
On the Greek Debt Crisis
On the Banking and Financial Sectors
On Brexit
On China
On India
On Global Inflation
On Currencies
On the US Debt
On the "Economics" of the Arab Spring
Blogs
Working Papers
Books
Books suggested by members



Change and Expectations in Macroeconomic Models: Recognizing the Limits to Knowability

Summary

In the first part of this paper, we sketch how this core premise (that fully predetermined accounts of change are possible) has derailed the development of macroeconomic analysis for the last four decades.2 We discuss why portraying outcomes with fully predetermined models lacks any connection – even as a bold abstraction – to how individuals forecast outcomes in real-world markets. Moreover, we explain how ignoring the limits to knowability has underpinned economists’ widespread belief that the so-called Rational Expectations Hypothesis (REH) represents how rational individuals forecast the future. That belief, we point out, has obscured our understanding of markets’ role in modern economies, and of how, in many markets, their participants’ forecasting drives outcomes. It has also led to a false dichotomy: rational decision-making based on fundamental considerations versus irrational behavior driven by psychological factors.

In the second part of the paper, we discuss how Imperfect Knowledge Economics (IKE) jettisons extant models’ core premise, and how this helps us to overcome their epistemological flaws. By opening economic models to non-routine change and recognizing imperfect knowledge on the part of economists, IKE reflects the fact that, as Popper put it, “Quite apart from the fact that we do not know the future, the future is objectively not fixed. The future is open: objectively open” (Popper, 1990, p. 18, emphasis added).

To download the PDF version of the working paper click here.


© 2011–2017 e-axes. All rights reserved. | Credits | Contact Us | Privacy Statement | Sat 20 Jan, 2018 01:30:39 AM
e-axes is proudly powered by Norder - Creative Solutions