The Ontological Status of Shocks and Trends in Macroeconomics | E-Axes
 

Search
Login
Username:
Password:
Not a member yet? Click here.
Forgot your Password?
Archives - Categories
Home
On Inequality
On the Eurozone Debt Crisis
On Monetary Policy and Central Banking
On Global Economic Growth
On the Greek Debt Crisis
On the Banking and Financial Sectors
On Brexit
On China
On India
On Global Inflation
On Currencies
On the US Debt
On the "Economics" of the Arab Spring
Blogs
Working Papers
Books
Books suggested by members



The Ontological Status of Shocks and Trends in Macroeconomics

Abstract

Modern empirical macroeconomic models, known as structural auto-regressions (SVARs) are dynamic models that typically claim to represent a causal order among contemporaneously valued variables and to merely represent non-structural (reduced-form) co-occurence between lagged variables and contemporaneous variables. The strategy is held to meet the minimal requirements for identifying the residual errors in particular equations in the model with independent, though otherwise not directly observable, exogenous causes (“shocks”) that ultimately account for change in the model. In non-stationary models, such shocks accumulate so that variables have discernible trends. Econo-metricians have conceived of variables that trend in sympathy with each other (so-called “co-integrated variables”) as sharing one or more of these unobserved trends as a common cause. It is possible for estimates of the values of both the otherwise unobservable individual shocks and the otherwise unobservable common trends to be backed-out of co-integrated systems of equations. The issue addressed in this paper is whether and in what circumstances these values can be regarded as observations of real entities rather than merely artifacts of the representation of variables in the model. The issue is related, on the one hand, to practical methodological problems in the use of SVARs for policy analysis – e.g., does it make sense to estimate of shocks or trends in one model and then use them as measures of variables in a conceptually distinct model? The issue is also related to debates in the philosophical analysis of causation – particularly, whether we are entitled, as assumed by the developers of Bayes-net approaches, to rely on the causal Markov condition (a generalization of Reichenbach’s common-cause condition) or whether co-integration generates a practical example of Nancy Cartwright’s “byproducts” objection to the causal Markov condition.

To download the PDF version of the working paper click here.


© 2011–2017 e-axes. All rights reserved. | Credits | Contact Us | Privacy Statement | Thu 23 Nov, 2017 22:01:54 PM
e-axes is proudly powered by Norder - Creative Solutions